Short answer: HSP Type 1 is granted on points (generally ≥70) with a limited period of stay tied to a designated organisation/activity. HSP Type 2 can be an indefinite status after meeting conditions such as a required period of Type 1 activity, with broader permitted activities and more job-change flexibility. Most people secure Type 1 first, then plan Type 2 or permanent residence.
How do Type 1 and Type 2 eligibility differ?
Type 1: score 70+ on the official table in one of three activity types (research, specialised/technical, business management) with a matching role. Period of stay is limited; renewals and employer/activity changes generally need a change-of-status application.
Type 2: requires a track record under Type 1 (including a set period of HSP activity). Once approved, stay is indefinite and activity limits are wider. See Japan Highly Skilled Professional Visa HSP.
How does this relate to permanent residence?
At 70 points, maintaining the score and other conditions for about 3 years can support a shortened PR residence-period exception; at 80 points, about 1 year. That is separate from whether you hold Type 2. Some push to 80 points for one-year PR; others take Type 2 for indefinite stay then apply for PR. The paths are complementary, not exclusive.
Type 1 vs Type 2 comparison
| Item | HSP Type 1 | HSP Type 2 |
|---|---|---|
| How obtained | Points ≥70 + qualifying activity | After required Type 1 activity period |
| Period of stay | Limited; must renew | Indefinite |
| Job change | Usually needs change of status | More flexible |
| Permanent residence | 70-pt ~3 years / 80-pt ~1 year track | May apply under general or special PR rules |
| Best for | First HSP status, score building | Stable careers needing more freedom |
Global Immigrate’s recommendation
New applicants should aim for Type 1 and a clear points plan (Japanese, salary, education bonuses). Those already working in Japan with a stable score can time Type 2 or a direct PR push. Recalculate points and procedures before any job change to avoid gaps. Taiwan and Hong Kong applicants use the same points table; evidence must be verifiable.
Data current as of October 2026. General information only; not legal advice.