Short answer: among Asia’s no-investment talent routes, Hong Kong’s TTPS is fastest (about four weeks), QMAS uses a points-based selection, and Japan’s HSP is points-based too, with permanent residence possible after one year at 80+ points.
The three compared
| Hong Kong TTPS | Hong Kong QMAS | Japan HSP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main requirement | HKD 2.5M+ income or an eligible degree | 6 of 12 criteria | 70+ points |
| Job offer first | No | No | Generally a job or business in Japan |
| Processing | About 4 weeks | About 6–9 months | About 1–3 months |
| Path to PR | Seven years’ continuous residence | Seven years’ continuous residence | One year at 80 points, three at 70 |
| Family | Spouse, children under 18 | Spouse, children under 18 | Spouse and children; parents if eligible |
How to choose
- High earners or top-university graduates wanting to move fast: TTPS.
- Strong overall profile that misses TTPS: QMAS.
- Work or a business in Japan, and a faster route to PR: Japan HSP.
Points to note
- Both Hong Kong schemes require employment or a business at extension.
- Japan HSP needs work or a business in Japan, not just a background.
- You can assess several routes at once and go with the earliest or best fit.
Try the Programme Finder with your education and income.